|
|
|
@ -54,115 +54,7 @@ class TestFwFingerprint(unittest.TestCase): |
|
|
|
|
if config.match_fw_to_car_fuzzy is None: |
|
|
|
|
raise unittest.SkipTest("Brand does not implement custom fuzzy fingerprinting function") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CP = car.CarParams.new_message() |
|
|
|
|
for _ in range(5): |
|
|
|
|
fw = [] |
|
|
|
|
for ecu, fw_versions in ecus.items(): |
|
|
|
|
ecu_name, addr, sub_addr = ecu |
|
|
|
|
fw.append({"ecu": ecu_name, "fwVersion": random.choice(fw_versions), 'brand': brand, |
|
|
|
|
"address": addr, "subAddress": 0 if sub_addr is None else sub_addr}) |
|
|
|
|
CP.carFw = fw |
|
|
|
|
_, matches = match_fw_to_car(CP.carFw, allow_exact=False, log=False) |
|
|
|
|
brand_matches = config.match_fw_to_car_fuzzy(build_fw_dict(CP.carFw)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# If both have matches, they must agree |
|
|
|
|
if len(matches) == 1 and len(brand_matches) == 1: |
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(matches, brand_matches) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@parameterized.expand([(b, c, e[c]) for b, e in VERSIONS.items() for c in e]) |
|
|
|
|
def test_fuzzy_match_ecu_count(self, brand, car_model, ecus): |
|
|
|
|
# Asserts that fuzzy matching does not count matching FW, but ECU address keys |
|
|
|
|
valid_ecus = [e for e in ecus if e[0] not in FUZZY_EXCLUDE_ECUS] |
|
|
|
|
if not len(valid_ecus): |
|
|
|
|
raise unittest.SkipTest("Car model has no compatible ECUs for fuzzy matching") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fw = [] |
|
|
|
|
for ecu in valid_ecus: |
|
|
|
|
ecu_name, addr, sub_addr = ecu |
|
|
|
|
for _ in range(5): |
|
|
|
|
# Add multiple FW versions to simulate ECU returning to multiple queries in a brand |
|
|
|
|
fw.append({"ecu": ecu_name, "fwVersion": random.choice(ecus[ecu]), 'brand': brand, |
|
|
|
|
"address": addr, "subAddress": 0 if sub_addr is None else sub_addr}) |
|
|
|
|
CP = car.CarParams.new_message(carFw=fw) |
|
|
|
|
_, matches = match_fw_to_car(CP.carFw, allow_exact=False, log=False) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Assert no match if there are not enough unique ECUs |
|
|
|
|
unique_ecus = {(f['address'], f['subAddress']) for f in fw} |
|
|
|
|
if len(unique_ecus) < 2: |
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(matches), 0, car_model) |
|
|
|
|
# There won't always be a match due to shared FW, but if there is it should be correct |
|
|
|
|
elif len(matches): |
|
|
|
|
self.assertFingerprints(matches, car_model) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_fw_version_lists(self): |
|
|
|
|
for car_model, ecus in FW_VERSIONS.items(): |
|
|
|
|
with self.subTest(car_model=car_model): |
|
|
|
|
for ecu, ecu_fw in ecus.items(): |
|
|
|
|
with self.subTest(ecu): |
|
|
|
|
duplicates = {fw for fw in ecu_fw if ecu_fw.count(fw) > 1} |
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(len(duplicates), f'{car_model}: Duplicate FW versions: Ecu.{ECU_NAME[ecu[0]]}, {duplicates}') |
|
|
|
|
self.assertGreater(len(ecu_fw), 0, f'{car_model}: No FW versions: Ecu.{ECU_NAME[ecu[0]]}') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_all_addrs_map_to_one_ecu(self): |
|
|
|
|
for brand, cars in VERSIONS.items(): |
|
|
|
|
addr_to_ecu = defaultdict(set) |
|
|
|
|
for ecus in cars.values(): |
|
|
|
|
for ecu_type, addr, sub_addr in ecus.keys(): |
|
|
|
|
addr_to_ecu[(addr, sub_addr)].add(ecu_type) |
|
|
|
|
ecus_for_addr = addr_to_ecu[(addr, sub_addr)] |
|
|
|
|
ecu_strings = ", ".join([f'Ecu.{ECU_NAME[ecu]}' for ecu in ecus_for_addr]) |
|
|
|
|
self.assertLessEqual(len(ecus_for_addr), 1, f"{brand} has multiple ECUs that map to one address: {ecu_strings} -> ({hex(addr)}, {sub_addr})") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_data_collection_ecus(self): |
|
|
|
|
# Asserts no extra ECUs are in the fingerprinting database |
|
|
|
|
for brand, config in FW_QUERY_CONFIGS.items(): |
|
|
|
|
for car_model, ecus in VERSIONS[brand].items(): |
|
|
|
|
bad_ecus = set(ecus).intersection(config.extra_ecus) |
|
|
|
|
with self.subTest(car_model=car_model): |
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(len(bad_ecus), f'{car_model}: Fingerprints contain ECUs added for data collection: {bad_ecus}') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_blacklisted_ecus(self): |
|
|
|
|
blacklisted_addrs = (0x7c4, 0x7d0) # includes A/C ecu and an unknown ecu |
|
|
|
|
for car_model, ecus in FW_VERSIONS.items(): |
|
|
|
|
with self.subTest(car_model=car_model): |
|
|
|
|
CP = interfaces[car_model][0].get_non_essential_params(car_model) |
|
|
|
|
if CP.carName == 'subaru': |
|
|
|
|
for ecu in ecus.keys(): |
|
|
|
|
self.assertNotIn(ecu[1], blacklisted_addrs, f'{car_model}: Blacklisted ecu: (Ecu.{ECU_NAME[ecu[0]]}, {hex(ecu[1])})') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elif CP.carName == "chrysler": |
|
|
|
|
# Some HD trucks have a combined TCM and ECM |
|
|
|
|
if CP.carFingerprint.startswith("RAM HD"): |
|
|
|
|
for ecu in ecus.keys(): |
|
|
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(ecu[0], Ecu.transmission, f"{car_model}: Blacklisted ecu: (Ecu.{ECU_NAME[ecu[0]]}, {hex(ecu[1])})") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_missing_versions_and_configs(self): |
|
|
|
|
brand_versions = set(VERSIONS.keys()) |
|
|
|
|
brand_configs = set(FW_QUERY_CONFIGS.keys()) |
|
|
|
|
if len(brand_configs - brand_versions): |
|
|
|
|
with self.subTest(): |
|
|
|
|
self.fail(f"Brands do not implement FW_VERSIONS: {brand_configs - brand_versions}") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if len(brand_versions - brand_configs): |
|
|
|
|
with self.subTest(): |
|
|
|
|
self.fail(f"Brands do not implement FW_QUERY_CONFIG: {brand_versions - brand_configs}") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_fw_request_ecu_whitelist(self): |
|
|
|
|
for brand, config in FW_QUERY_CONFIGS.items(): |
|
|
|
|
with self.subTest(brand=brand): |
|
|
|
|
whitelisted_ecus = {ecu for r in config.requests for ecu in r.whitelist_ecus} |
|
|
|
|
brand_ecus = {fw[0] for car_fw in VERSIONS[brand].values() for fw in car_fw} |
|
|
|
|
brand_ecus |= {ecu[0] for ecu in config.extra_ecus} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# each ecu in brand's fw versions + extra ecus needs to be whitelisted at least once |
|
|
|
|
ecus_not_whitelisted = brand_ecus - whitelisted_ecus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ecu_strings = ", ".join([f'Ecu.{ECU_NAME[ecu]}' for ecu in ecus_not_whitelisted]) |
|
|
|
|
self.assertFalse(len(whitelisted_ecus) and len(ecus_not_whitelisted), |
|
|
|
|
f'{brand.title()}: FW query whitelist missing ecus: {ecu_strings}') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestFwFingerprintTiming(unittest.TestCase): |
|
|
|
|
class TestFwFingerprintLive(unittest.TestCase): |
|
|
|
|
@staticmethod |
|
|
|
|
def _benchmark(brand, num_pandas, n): |
|
|
|
|
params = Params() |
|
|
|
@ -186,7 +78,11 @@ class TestFwFingerprintTiming(unittest.TestCase): |
|
|
|
|
self.assertLess(avg_time, ref_time + tol) |
|
|
|
|
self.assertGreater(avg_time, ref_time - tol, "Performance seems to have improved, update test refs.") |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_fw_query_timing(self): |
|
|
|
|
def test_fw_query_live(self): |
|
|
|
|
# Runs one of the functions used live to query FW versions from the car (get_fw_versions) |
|
|
|
|
# This test asserts a few things: |
|
|
|
|
# - Brand and whole query timings |
|
|
|
|
# - Global FW versions dict that is uses to query with and match candidates against remains static |
|
|
|
|
tol = 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
total_ref_time = 4.6 |
|
|
|
|
brand_ref_times = { |
|
|
|
@ -218,7 +114,7 @@ class TestFwFingerprintTiming(unittest.TestCase): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
avg_time = self._benchmark(brand, num_pandas, 5) |
|
|
|
|
total_time += avg_time |
|
|
|
|
# self._assert_timing(avg_time, brand_ref_times[num_pandas][brand], tol) |
|
|
|
|
self._assert_timing(avg_time, brand_ref_times[num_pandas][brand], tol) |
|
|
|
|
print(f'{brand=}, {num_pandas=}, {len(config.requests)=}, avg FW query time={avg_time} seconds') |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with self.subTest(brand='all_brands'): |
|
|
|
|